Case 4103033/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Mark McLeod v (and others whose names and addresses appear in the attached schedule) Gibson Direct Ltd (in liquidation) and 1 other — 2022
- Case reference
- 4103033/2022
- Decision date
- 22 July 2022
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge M Whitcombe
Parties
3 namedKey findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 judgment issued on the available material. The first respondent did not present a response within the time limit, and the liquidators later confirmed in writing that they did not contest the claim and consented to judgment. The tribunal held that each claimant was entitled to bring the claim because it concerned, in part, a failure relating to the election of employee representatives, and alternatively because the claimants were employees dismissed as redundant.
The tribunal found the complaint well founded. It held that the first respondent dismissed as redundant more than 20 employees at one establishment within a period of 90 days or less, that there was no recognised trade union or other appropriate employee representatives, and that the respondent failed to ensure that employee representatives were elected in accordance with section 188A and then consulted in accordance with section 188 of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992.
A protective award was made in respect of each claimant. The protected period was stated to begin on 31 October 2021 and to last for 90 days. The respondent was ordered to pay the relevant sums to each claimant, but the extracted judgment text does not give a monetary breakdown or a total figure.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trade union | Protective award claim under sections 188 and 188A of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992. The judgment does not state a monetary figure for any individual claimant. | Upheld | — | — |
Legal tests applied
4 references- Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2013
- s.188 TULR(C)A 1992
- s.188A TULR(C)A 1992
- s.189(1)(a)-(c) TULR(C)A 1992
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.