Case 4103036/2020 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4103036/2020 J Demir, Legal Officer Mr M Parkinson v Represented by: Mr S Horsfield - Solicitor Blatchford Limited — 2021
- Case reference
- 4103036/2020
- Decision date
- 2 September 2021
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4103036/2020 J Demir, Legal Officer Mr M Parkinson
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis is a short procedural disposal. The judgment records that the claim was withdrawn by the claimant and was therefore dismissed under Rule 52 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013. No findings are set out on liability, and no remedy is recorded.
The decision was issued by Legal Officer Jenny Demir on 16 August 2021 and entered in the register on 2 September 2021. It also states that, because the decision was made by a Legal Officer, either party could apply for the matter to be considered afresh by an Employment Judge within 14 days of the judgment being sent to the parties.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The extracted judgment does not identify the underlying claim in detail; it records that 'the claim' was withdrawn by the claimant and dismissed under Rule 52. The unfair dismissal label is taken from the case listing metadata. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Sex discrimination | The extracted judgment does not identify the underlying claim in detail; it records that 'the claim' was withdrawn by the claimant and dismissed under Rule 52. The sex discrimination label is taken from the case listing metadata. | Withdrawn | Sex | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 52 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.