Case 4103044/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr G Freeland v Represented by Ms A Park Intern Pollock Division Ex-Servicemen’s Club Ltd — 2022
- Case reference
- 4103044/2020
- Decision date
- 31 January 2022
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge M Robison
- Venue
- Glasgow
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr G Freeland
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt Glasgow on 28 January 2022, the Employment Tribunal ordered the respondent to pay Mr G Freeland £8,756 in respect of unfair dismissal and £1,467.20 in respect of holiday pay. The judgment states that the respondent's response was struck out.
The judgment also records that the Employment Tribunals (Recoupment of Benefits) Regulations 1996 applied to the award. The prescribed element was £6,160 and related to the period from 29 January 2020 to 25 January 2021. No separate basic award, compensatory award breakdown, or interest figure is stated in the judgment text provided, and the total amount payable was £10,223.20.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal ordered payment of £8,756 in respect of unfair dismissal. The judgment also records that the respondent's response was struck out and that the prescribed element under the recoupment regulations was £6,160 for 29 January 2020 to 25 January 2021. | Upheld | — | £8,756 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal ordered payment of £1,467.20 in respect of holiday pay. | Upheld | — | £1,467 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £10,223
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.