Case 4103062/2022 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4103062/2022 Mr S Girvan v Braehead Radio Cars Scotland Ltd — 2022
- Case reference
- 4103062/2022
- Decision date
- 7 July 2022
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge M Robison Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4103062/2022 Mr S Girvan
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 judgment issued because no response had been presented to the claim. On the available material, Employment Judge M Robison decided the case without a hearing and cancelled the hearing listed for 16 August 2022.
The tribunal found that Mr S Girvan had been dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice. It ordered Braehead Radio Cars Scotland Ltd to pay damages of £2,160.00 for that breach.
The tribunal also found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and ordered £480.00, calculated as 6 days at £80.00 per day. In addition, it found an unauthorised deduction from wages and ordered £410.00. The total sum awarded was £3,050.00.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The tribunal found the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and ordered damages of £2,160.00. | Upheld | — | £2,160 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and ordered £480.00, calculated as 6 days at £80.00 per day. | Upheld | — | £480 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found an unauthorised deduction from wages and ordered payment of £410.00. | Upheld | — | £410 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £3,050
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.