Case 4103075/2017 · Employment Tribunal
Case Number: 4103075/2017 Ms C Burrows v Glasgow City Council Cordia Services LLP — 2025
- Case reference
- 4103075/2017
- Decision date
- 14 March 2025
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Frances Eccles
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Case Number: 4103075/2017 Ms C Burrows
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal struck out Ms C Burrows's claim under rule 38 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2024 on the ground that it had not been actively pursued within rule 38(1)(d). The decision records that the claimant's solicitors had withdrawn, that a strike-out warning letter was sent on 7 February 2025 after she did not reply to a status enquiry letter, and that the Tribunal then received returned correspondence showing she no longer lived at the address on the ET1.
The tribunal found that no steps had been taken to provide a new address, so it could not communicate with the claimant and could not give her notice under rule 38(2). In those circumstances, the Tribunal assumed she no longer wished to pursue the claim and ordered it struck out. No remedy was awarded and no substantive liability findings were made.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment does not identify the substantive nature of the underlying claim; it only records that the claim was struck out under rule 38(1)(d) for not having been actively pursued. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- rule 38(1)(d)
- rule 38(2)
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.