Case 4103080/2019 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case Number: 4103080/2019 Mr G Duncan v The New School Butterstone — 2022
- Case reference
- 4103080/2019
- Decision date
- 9 November 2022
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge S Maclean Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case Number: 4103080/2019 Mr G Duncan
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal did not determine the merits of the underlying employment claims. It recorded that the claimant’s representative withdrew on 30 August 2022 and that the tribunal wrote to the claimant on 28 September 2022 seeking an update, but no reply was received.
On 19 October 2022 the tribunal gave the claimant an opportunity to provide written reasons by 2 November 2022, or to request a hearing, to explain why the claim should not be struck out. No acceptable reason was provided and no hearing was requested.
The tribunal therefore struck out the claim under rule 37 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013 on the ground that it had not been actively pursued under rule 37(1)(d). No remedy or award was made.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The tribunal struck out the claim under rule 37(1)(d) on the ground that it had not been actively pursued. The claimant’s representative had withdrawn on 30 August 2022, no response was received to the tribunal’s letter of 28 September 2022, and no acceptable reason or request for a hearing was provided after the tribunal’s 19 October 2022 opportunity. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.