Case 4103087/2019 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case Number: 4103087/2019 Mr A Mathieson v The New School Butterstone — 2022
- Case reference
- 4103087/2019
- Decision date
- 9 November 2022
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge S Maclean Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case Number: 4103087/2019 Mr A Mathieson
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant’s representative withdrew from acting on 6 June 2022. The tribunal then wrote to the claimant on 8 June 2022 and again on 28 September 2022 asking for an update, but received no reply.
On 19 October 2022 the tribunal gave the claimant until 2 November 2022 to provide written reasons why the claim should not be struck out, or to request a hearing for that purpose. No acceptable reason was provided and no hearing was requested. The tribunal therefore struck out the claim for non-prosecution under rule 37(1)(d) of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The tribunal struck out the claim under rule 37 because it had not been actively pursued. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- rule 37(1)(d) of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013
- rule 37 of Schedule 1 to the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.