Case 4103091/2019 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case Number: 4103091/2019 Mr P Nelis v The New School Butterstone — 2022
- Case reference
- 4103091/2019
- Decision date
- 9 November 2022
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge S Maclean Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case Number: 4103091/2019 Mr P Nelis
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal struck out the claim under rule 37 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013 because it had not been actively pursued within rule 37(1)(d). The judgment is procedural only and does not determine the merits of the underlying case.
The reasons recorded that the claimant's representative withdrew on 30 August 2022, after which the tribunal wrote to the claimant on 28 September 2022 seeking an update but received no reply. On 19 October 2022 the tribunal gave the claimant an opportunity to provide written reasons by 2 November 2022 or to request a hearing on why the claim should not be struck out, but no acceptable reason was provided and no hearing was requested.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment records only that 'the claim' was struck out for not being actively pursued under rule 37(1)(d); it does not specify the underlying substantive heads of claim in the extracted text. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 37(1)(d)
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.