Case 4103107/2022 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4103107/2022 Mr J Marshall v Brite Technical Services Limited — 2022
- Case reference
- 4103107/2022
- Decision date
- 21 July 2022
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge C McManus Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4103107/2022 Mr J Marshall
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 judgment in which no response had been presented. On the available material, Employment Judge C McManus held that Mr J Marshall had been dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice. The tribunal awarded damages of £1,225.97, described as one month’s notice net of Income Tax and employee National Insurance contributions.
The tribunal also found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant’s holiday entitlement. It ordered payment of £436.58 for 7 days’ holiday pay. The judgment records that this sum was gross, and that the respondent could make any deductions required by law before payment, provided the deductions were remitted to HMRC and evidenced to the claimant. The hearing listed for 17 August 2022 was cancelled.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | Dismissal was found to be in breach of contract in respect of notice. Damages were ordered at £1,225.97, described as one month’s notice net of Income Tax and employee National Insurance contributions. | Upheld | — | £1,226 |
| Holiday pay | The respondent failed to pay the claimant’s holiday entitlement. The tribunal ordered £436.58 for 7 days’ holiday pay, stated to be a gross amount, subject to lawful deductions if applicable. | Upheld | — | £437 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,663
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.