Mr J Cryne v Respondent — 2018

Case reference: 4103113/2012
Decision date: 30 November 2018
Jurisdiction: Scotland
Judge: Employment Judge Laura Doherty
Venue: Glasgow

Indexed: 21 May 2026

Parties

1 named

Claimant

Mr J Cryne

Respondent

Key findings

Tribunal's reasoning

The Employment Tribunal for Scotland, sitting in Glasgow before Employment Judge Laura Doherty, struck out Mr J Cryne's claim against The City of Edinburgh Council under rule 37 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013. The stated ground was that the claim had not been actively pursued in terms of rule 37(1)(d).

The reasons record that on 25 September 2018 the Tribunal gave the claimant an opportunity to provide written reasons by 2 October 2018, or to request a hearing to consider why the claim should not be struck out. The claimant did not give an acceptable reason why such an order should not be made and did not request a hearing. The Tribunal therefore struck out the claim. No financial remedy was awarded.

Claims and outcomes

1 finding recorded

Claim type	Issue or finding	Outcome	Protected characteristic	Award
Equal pay	The claim was struck out under rule 37 on the ground that it had not been actively pursued, specifically rule 37(1)(d).	Struck out	—	—

Legal tests applied

2 references

Official outcome judgment PDF

Gov.uk primary record

The official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.

Open official judgment PDF on gov.uk

Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

How we got this data

Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.

Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.