Case 4103131/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Ms Lynne Sloan v Greenleaf Hygiene Solutions (Scotland) Ltd — 2019
- Case reference
- 4103131/2019
- Decision date
- 1 July 2019
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Claire McManus
- Venue
- Glasgow
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms Lynne Sloan
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMs Lynne Sloan brought a claim for unpaid wages arising out of her employment with Greenleaf Hygiene Solutions (Scotland) Ltd, which ended on 4 January 2019. The tribunal treated the case as one under section 13 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 and considered the claimant's asserted heads of salary, SSP, accrued holiday, commission, bonus, car hire and legal expenses. It heard evidence from the claimant, Mr John O'Donnell for the respondent, and Lorna Dougall.
The tribunal accepted the respondent's evidence on commission and bonus and held that no further sums were due on those heads. It also held that the car hire and legal expenses items were not wages within the meaning of section 13 ERA 1996. The tribunal found the respondent had wrongly applied SSP waiting-day rules by treating the first five days as unpaid, whereas SSP was not payable only for the first three qualifying days in a period of entitlement.
On holiday pay, the tribunal found that the claimant had already been paid for five days of accrued holiday, but that the respondent's calculations failed to account for Scottish bank holidays on 25 and 26 December 2018 and 1 and 2 January 2019. It accepted that there was no agreement that the claimant should be treated as taking accrued holidays during suspension and held that her sickness absence superseded any entitlement to full pay while suspended pending investigation.
The tribunal calculated that the claimant should have received £780.57 in total for the relevant periods, against payments already made of £515.47, leaving £265.10 outstanding. Judgment was entered for that sum, subject to any lawful deductions for tax and employee National Insurance if required.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal upheld the claim only to the extent of unpaid SSP and holiday pay. It rejected the claimant's commission, bonus, car hire and legal expenses items, and found the net balance due after set-off of amounts already paid was £265.10. | Upheld | — | £265 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £265
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
5 references- s.13 ERA 1996
- s.27 ERA 1996
- s.155 Social Security Contributions and Benefits Act 1992
- balance of probabilities
- Kinsman and anor v Drumconnerr Ltd
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.