Case 4103132/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Miss Lungowe Kashina v The City of Edinburgh Council — 2019
- Case reference
- 4103132/2019
- Decision date
- 10 December 2019
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Rory McPherson
- Venue
- Edinburgh
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss Lungowe Kashina
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe preliminary hearing considered whether the Tribunal had jurisdiction over two complaints: an alleged breach of contract and a claim for loss said to arise from an alleged verbal response by the respondent to a third party's request for a reference. The Tribunal found that the claimant had started employment with the respondent on 1 December 2014 and remained employed by it at the date of the hearing.
The Tribunal held that it did not have jurisdiction to consider the breach of contract claim under the Employment Tribunals (Extension of Jurisdiction) (Scotland) Order 1994, because such a claim must arise or be outstanding on termination of employment. It also held that the reference-related loss claim was a free-standing complaint and not part of a statutory complaint within the Tribunal's jurisdiction.
Both claims considered at the preliminary hearing were struck out and dismissed. The judgment recorded that other aspects of the claimant's claims, understood to include complaints broadly stated under the Working Time Regulations, were to proceed to a further case management preliminary hearing, with the respondent reserving a time bar argument.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | Dismissed because the Tribunal found it did not have jurisdiction under the Employment Tribunals (Extension of Jurisdiction) (Scotland) Order 1994 while the claimant remained employed by the respondent. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Other | Claim for asserted loss arising from an alleged verbal response to a requested reference was dismissed for lack of jurisdiction; the Tribunal described it as a free-standing complaint and not part of a statutory complaint within its jurisdiction. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
3 references- Employment Tribunals (Extension of Jurisdiction) (Scotland) Order 1994
- Employment Tribunals Act 1996 s.3(2) and s.3(3)
- Rule 37 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.