Case 4103139/2019 · Employment Tribunal
69(scot) claim dismissed on withdrawal rule EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4103139/2019 Mr J Robinson v Represented by: Mr G Bathgate Solicitor Tayside Public Transport Company Limited — 2020
- Case reference
- 4103139/2019
- Decision date
- 29 January 2020
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Ian McFatridge
Parties
2 namedClaimant
69(scot) claim dismissed on withdrawal rule EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4103139/2019 Mr J Robinson
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a one-page Employment Tribunal Scotland judgment in case 4103139/2019, Mr J Robinson v Tayside Public Transport Company Limited, dated 29 January 2020. The claimant was represented by Mr G Bathgate, solicitor, and the respondent by Mr S Allison, solicitor.
The judgment records that the claim had been withdrawn by the claimant. On that basis, the tribunal dismissed the claim under Rule 52 of the Rules contained in Schedule 1 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013.
No substantive findings on the underlying merits were made, and the judgment does not record any remedy, award, or legal analysis beyond the procedural dismissal following withdrawal.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment states that the claim was withdrawn by the claimant and dismissed under Rule 52 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.