Case 4103153/2019 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4103153/2019 Mrs E Meechan v Ryan Mulheron — 2019
- Case reference
- 4103153/2019
- Decision date
- 8 May 2019
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Peter O’Donell
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4103153/2019 Mrs E Meechan
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningNo response was presented to the claim, and Employment Judge Peter O’Donell issued judgment on the available material under rule 21 of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2013. The judgment records that the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from the claimant’s wages, and ordered payment of £1,500 in respect of that claim.
The tribunal also found that the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice. Damages for that breach were assessed at £375.
In addition, the tribunal found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant’s holiday entitlement, and ordered payment of £375. The hearing listed for 7 June 2019 was cancelled.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £1,500 |
| Breach of contract | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £375 |
| Holiday pay | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £375 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,250
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.