Case 4103181/2019 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4103181/2019 Mr S McFadzean v Kirk Limited t/a Rainbow International — 2019
- Case reference
- 4103181/2019
- Decision date
- 17 May 2019
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Peter O’Donell
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4103181/2019 Mr S McFadzean
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 judgment issued on the available material because no response had been presented. Employment Judge Peter O’Donell recorded that the claimant, Mr S McFadzean, was employed by Kirk Limited t/a Rainbow International.
The tribunal found that the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and ordered the respondent to pay damages of £3,602.28. It also found that the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy and was entitled to a redundancy payment of £6,713.46.
The listed hearing on 12 June 2019 was cancelled. No other claims, tests, or remedies were recorded in the judgment text.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | Rule 21 judgment issued on the available material after no response was presented. | Upheld | — | £3,602 |
| Redundancy | The tribunal found the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy and entitled to a redundancy payment. | Upheld | — | £6,713 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £10,316
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.