Case 4103183/2019 · Employment Tribunal
69(scot) claim dismissed on withdrawal rule EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4103183/2019 & 4103185/2019 Mrs S Taylor v Represented by: The Smart Pub Company Ltd — 2019
- Case reference
- 4103183/2019
- Decision date
- 2 July 2019
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Ian McFatridge
Parties
2 namedClaimant
69(scot) claim dismissed on withdrawal rule EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4103183/2019 & 4103185/2019 Mrs S Taylor
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe judgment records that Mrs S Taylor brought two tribunal claims under case numbers 4103183/2019 and 4103185/2019. On 2 July 2019, Employment Judge Ian McFatridge stated that the claims had been withdrawn by the claimant and were dismissed under Rule 52 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013.
The extracted text does not set out the underlying allegations, any disputed facts, or any liability findings. No substantive legal test, remedy assessment, or monetary award is recorded in the judgment text. The disposal is therefore recorded as a withdrawal-based dismissal with no award.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | Case 4103183/2019. The extracted judgment text does not identify the substantive cause of action; it states that the claim was withdrawn by the claimant and dismissed under Rule 52. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Other | Case 4103185/2019. The extracted judgment text does not identify the substantive cause of action; it states that the claim was withdrawn by the claimant and dismissed under Rule 52. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.