Case 4103191/2019 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4103191/2019 Mr G Petrie v Limited (in Liquidation) — 2019
- Case reference
- 4103191/2019
- Decision date
- 2 August 2019
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge James Hendry
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4103191/2019 Mr G Petrie
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe judgment records that Mr G Petrie brought a claim against Dril-Quip (Europe) Limited. The claimant was represented by Mr P Lefevre of Quantum Claims, and the respondent was represented by Ms T Walker, solicitor.
The tribunal did not make substantive findings on the merits of the claims. It recorded that the claim had been withdrawn by the claimant and dismissed it under Rule 52 of the Rules contained in Schedule 1 to the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment states that the claim had been withdrawn by the claimant and was dismissed under Rule 52. The unfair dismissal classification follows the listing category rather than detail in the short judgment text. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Breach of contract | The judgment states that the claim had been withdrawn by the claimant and was dismissed under Rule 52. The breach of contract classification follows the listing category rather than detail in the short judgment text. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 52 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.