Case 4103204/2014 · Employment Tribunal
Ms S Kerr v Unrepresented North Lanarkshire Council — 2017
- Case reference
- 4103204/2014
- Decision date
- 10 August 2017
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Frances Eccles
- Venue
- COET Scotland
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms S Kerr
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningOn 4 July 2017 the Tribunal gave Ms S Kerr an opportunity to provide written reasons by 18 July 2017, or to request a hearing to explain why the claim should not be struck out. The judgment records no substantive findings on the underlying claim, only that the claimant had the chance to address the proposed strike out.
The claimant did not give an acceptable reason why strike out should not be ordered and did not request a hearing. The Tribunal therefore struck out the claim on 10 August 2017 under rule 37, relying on rule 37(1)(d) on the basis that the claim had not been actively pursued.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equal pay | The extracted judgment does not specify the substantive claim type; the case was listed as Equal Pay Act and is classified here as equal_pay. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 37(1)(d) of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.