Case 4103277/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Miss G Limond v Represented by: Ms R Medlock - Solicitor Eurotrade Windows Limited t/a The Kirkton Inn — 2022
- Case reference
- 4103277/2022
- Decision date
- 18 October 2022
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Smith
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss G Limond
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was an interim Employment Tribunal order, not a substantive liability judgment. At a hearing held via Cloud Video Platform on 17 October 2022, Employment Judge Smith allowed the respondent's application to amend the response dated 7 September 2022, and directed that the document appended to that application would stand as the response to the claim.
The judgment states that oral reasons were given at the hearing, but no written reasons were provided in the order itself unless requested in writing within 14 days. No findings were made on the merits of the underlying claim(s), and no remedy was determined.
The tribunal directed that the case be listed for a full hearing before an Employment Judge sitting alone, with a time estimate of three days, and asked the parties to provide availability for December 2022, January 2023 and February 2023.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment is an interim order, not a merits decision. It allows the respondent's application to amend its response and lists the case for a full hearing. | Upheld | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.