Case 4103288/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Claimant v Openreach Ltd — 2019
- Case reference
- 4103288/2019
- Decision date
- 6 November 2019
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge A Kemp
- Venue
- Glasgow
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Claimant
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant was dismissed summarily after disciplinary proceedings concerning three allegations: aggressive and intimidating conduct at a meeting with his manager, possession of a bladed multi-tool in his company vehicle and admitted previous carrying of a pen knife at work, and an anonymous report that he had removed a knife from his bag at work. The tribunal found that the respondent had established conduct as the reason for dismissal and rejected the claimant's contention that the stated matters were being used to hide another reason.
The tribunal found that the dismissing manager held a genuine belief that the claimant had committed gross misconduct, that the belief was reasonably held, and that it followed a reasonable investigation. It accepted that there were difficulties with the anonymous evidence, but considered that it was supported by other evidence, including the multi-tool found in the van and the claimant's own admission that he had carried a pen knife on earlier occasions for protection.
The tribunal held that the disciplinary procedure and appeal were within the range of reasonable responses and that the ACAS Code had been followed. Taking the allegations together, especially the matters involving bladed items and the risk identified by the respondent, the tribunal concluded that summary dismissal was open to a reasonable employer and dismissed the claim.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The claimant pursued only unfair dismissal. The tribunal found the dismissal was for conduct, a potentially fair reason, and was not unfair under section 98(4) ERA 1996. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
7 references- s.98(4) Employment Rights Act 1996
- Burchell test
- band of reasonable responses
- Iceland Frozen Foods Ltd v Jones
- Polkey v A E Dayton Services
- Linfood Cash and Carry Ltd v Thomson
- ACAS Code of Practice on Disciplinary and Grievance Procedures
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.