Case 4103292/2023 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4103292/2023 Mr E Saklaras v Nevis Ensemble — 2023
- Case reference
- 4103292/2023
- Decision date
- 19 December 2023
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge S Maclean Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4103292/2023 Mr E Saklaras
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe judgment was issued under rule 21 because no response was presented by the respondent. On the available material, the tribunal found that the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from the claimant's wages and ordered payment of £876.81.
The tribunal also found that the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and awarded £239.13 as damages for one week's gross pay. In addition, it found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and awarded £470.29 for 5.9 days' gross pay.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Award described as eleven days' gross pay at £79.71 per day. | Upheld | — | £877 |
| Breach of contract | Award described as damages for one week's gross pay in lieu of notice. | Upheld | — | £239 |
| Holiday pay | Award described as 5.9 days' gross pay at £79.71 per day for unpaid holiday entitlement. | Upheld | — | £470 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,586
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 21 of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.