Case 4103293/2023 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4103293/2023 Mr R Schoham v Nevis Ensemble — 2023
- Case reference
- 4103293/2023
- Decision date
- 19 December 2023
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge S Maclean Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4103293/2023 Mr R Schoham
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 judgment issued because no response was presented by the respondent. The Employment Judge decided the claim on the available material.
The tribunal found that the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from wages and ordered payment of £1,036.23, calculated as 13 days' gross pay at £79.71 per day. It also found that the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and awarded £239.13, stated to be one week's gross pay.
The tribunal further found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £470.29, calculated as 5.9 days' gross pay at £79.71 per day.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Rule 21 judgment. Award described as 13 days' gross pay at £79.71 per day. | Upheld | — | £1,036 |
| Breach of contract | Judgment states the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice; damages awarded as one week's gross pay. | Upheld | — | £239 |
| Holiday pay | Award described as 5.9 days' gross pay at £79.71 per day for unpaid holiday entitlement. | Upheld | — | £470 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,746
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.