Case 4103297/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Mr J Rennie v R T McEwan Ltd — 2026
- Case reference
- 4103297/2025
- Decision date
- 2 June 2026
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge A Kemp
- Venue
- Dundee remotely
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr J Rennie
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant, Mr James Rennie, was employed by R T McEwan Ltd as an LGV driver from 30 January 2023 and was paid hourly, with basic hours and overtime paid on different weekly timings. The tribunal identified the issues as whether the claimant had suffered unauthorised deductions from wages under section 13 of the Employment Rights Act 1996, having regard to section 14, and what sum should be awarded if so.
The tribunal found that the claimant had been paid for the week commencing 19 May 2025, despite his concern that the timing of payments meant that week had been lost. It also found that a deduction for 1.5 days' holiday pay had been properly made, because the claimant had been paid for more holiday than his entitlement when the 2025 pro rata position was taken into account. The tribunal noted concerns about holiday pay calculation and rounding practices but stated those matters were not the case before it and were not determined.
The tribunal was not satisfied that the respondent had proved an overpayment of overtime. It found that the respondent relied on a spreadsheet showing a difference between overtime paid and overtime said to be due, but the witness could not explain when or why any overpayment had occurred, and there were inconsistencies with other records and the later payment described as a shortfall. The tribunal therefore concluded that the deduction of 19.5 overtime hours was an unauthorised deduction under section 13.
For remedy, the tribunal calculated that 7.75 overtime hours remained due after the respondent's later payment of 11.75 hours, producing £112.14 at the overtime rate of £14.47. It also awarded £1.12 for a 0.5 hour overtime underpayment, representing the difference between the basic rate and overtime rate. The total award was £113.26 gross, subject to any necessary statutory deductions.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The claim succeeded in relation to the overtime deduction and a 0.5 hour overtime underpayment. The tribunal rejected other wage issues concerning payment for the week commencing 19 May 2025 and the holiday pay deduction. | Upheld | — | £113 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £113
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
3 references- section 13 Employment Rights Act 1996
- section 14 Employment Rights Act 1996
- Gill and others v Ford Motor Co Ltd [2004] IRLR 840
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.