Case 4103301/2018 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4103301/2018 Mr G Taylor v S Hallside Limited (T/A Publicity Printing) — 2018
- Case reference
- 4103301/2018
- Decision date
- 4 October 2018
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge R Gall
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4103301/2018 Mr G Taylor
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe judgment records that Mr G Taylor's claim against S Hallside Limited (T/A Publicity Printing) had been withdrawn by the claimant. On that basis, the Employment Tribunal dismissed the claim under Rule 52 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013.
The extracted text does not contain any findings on the underlying merits of the dispute, any evidence heard, or any assessment of liability. It is a short procedural disposal only, dated 4 October 2018 and entered by Employment Judge R Gall.
No remedy was awarded and no monetary figures are recorded in the judgment text supplied.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment states only that the claim had been withdrawn by the claimant and was dismissed under Rule 52. The extracted text does not specify which pleaded claim(s) were withdrawn. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 52 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.