Case 4103307/2014 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4103307/2014 & others Mr J Baird v & Others (see attached schedule) Galliford Try Employment Limited — 2018
- Case reference
- 4103307/2014
- Decision date
- 3 July 2018
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Robert Gall
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4103307/2014 & others Mr J Baird
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a multiple-claimant case brought by Mr J Baird and others against Galliford Try Employment Limited. The judgment records that the claims were withdrawn by the claimants.
Employment Judge Robert Gall therefore dismissed the claims under Rule 52 of the Rules contained in Schedule 1 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013. The judgment does not record any substantive liability findings or any monetary award.
The case was entered in the register and copied to the parties on 3 July 2018. The attached schedule listed the claimants including Mr R Bell, Mr IH Burke, Mr J Fraser, Mr E Goodman, Mr T McLachlan, Mr EP McLellan, Mr W McNally and Mr MR Pope.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Working time regulations | The judgment states that the claims had been withdrawn by the claimants and were dismissed under Rule 52 of the Employment Tribunals Rules 2013. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 52 of the Rules contained in Schedule 1 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.