Case 4103311/2019 · Employment Tribunal

EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4103311/2019 Ms E Rodger v Represented by: I Moretti - Solicitor Grampian Health Board — 2019

Case reference: 4103311/2019
Decision date: 31 July 2019
Jurisdiction: Scotland
Judge: Employment Judge James Hendry

Indexed: 23 May 2026

Parties

2 named

Claimant

EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4103311/2019 Ms E Rodger

Respondent

Represented by: I Moretti - Solicitor Grampian Health Board

Key findings

Tribunal's reasoning

The tribunal recorded that the claim had been withdrawn by the claimant. It therefore dismissed the claim under Rule 52 of the Rules contained in Schedule 1 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013.

No substantive findings on liability, unfair dismissal issues, or remedy were made in the judgment. The document is a short disposal judgment only and does not record any award of compensation or other monetary relief.

The judgment was issued by Employment Judge James Hendry and dated 30 July 2019, with the date sent to the parties recorded as 31 July 2019.

Claims and outcomes

1 finding recorded

Claim type	Issue or finding	Outcome	Protected characteristic	Award
Unfair dismissal	The judgment states that the claim had been withdrawn by the claimant and was dismissed under Rule 52 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013.	Withdrawn	—	—

Legal tests applied

1 reference

Official outcome judgment PDF

Gov.uk primary record

The official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.

Open official judgment PDF on gov.uk

Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

How we got this data

Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.

Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.