Case 4103326/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr C Lindsay v Taw Leisure Ltd — 2023
- Case reference
- 4103326/2022
- Decision date
- 17 February 2023
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge C McManus
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr C Lindsay
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal had received no recent correspondence from Mr C Lindsay. On 21 July 2022 it wrote to him after being told that the respondent company had been dissolved, advised that the case would be sisted for six months, and asked him to notify the Tribunal if he applied to have the company restored to the register. No reply was received.
On 31 January 2023 the Tribunal gave Mr Lindsay an opportunity to provide written reasons by 14 February 2023, or to request a hearing, to explain why the claim should not be struck out. He did not respond. Employment Judge C McManus therefore struck out the claim under rule 37 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013, on the ground that it had not been actively pursued within rule 37(1)(d).
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The extracted reasons do not identify the substantive cause of action; the claim was struck out under rule 37(1)(d) because it had not been actively pursued. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 37(1)(d)
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.