Case 4103327/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs C Stewart v Capital Cooling Limited (in Administration) st — 2019
- Case reference
- 4103327/2018
- Decision date
- 11 April 2019
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Porter
- Venue
- Edinburgh
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs C Stewart
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningOn 21 March 2019, the Tribunal gave the claimant an opportunity to provide written reasons by 29 March 2019 or to request a hearing to address why the claim should not be struck out. The judgment records that the claimant did not provide an acceptable reason and did not request a hearing.
The Tribunal therefore struck out the claim under rule 37 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013 on the ground that it had not been actively pursued, relying on rule 37(1)(d). The judgment does not determine the underlying merits of the claim.
No monetary award is recorded. The judgment is limited to the strike-out decision and the procedural reason for it.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment does not identify a merits outcome for a specific claim type; it records that the claim was struck out under rule 37(1)(d) because it had not been actively pursued. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- rule 37(1)(d)
- rule 37 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.