Case 4103330/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr T Vizoviczki v Represented by: Mr S Wilson - Solicitor Tapa Capulus & Pistrino Limited — 2020
- Case reference
- 4103330/2020
- Decision date
- 9 December 2020
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge J Young
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr T Vizoviczki
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt the CVP hearing on 30 October 2020, with no appearance or representation for the respondent, the tribunal substituted Tapa Capulus & Pistrino Limited as respondent. The claimant was employed as a baker from 5 February 2008 to 29 March 2020. Wage slips and TSB bank statements showed that wages became erratic from December 2018, with shortfalls identified as £4,072.37 in 2019 and £222.52 in 2020. After later payments of £500 and £200 in June and August 2020, the remaining contractual wage balance was £5,594.89.
On the unfair dismissal claim, the tribunal held that non-payment or part-payment of wages was a fundamental breach of contract and that the claimant resigned in response to that continuing breach. Although his resignation email referred to the 'current uncertain circumstances of business at Tapa' rather than expressly to underpayment, the tribunal accepted that this referred to the wage problem. It found no undue delay or affirmation because the shortfalls continued into January and March 2020. The tribunal cited s.95(1)(c) ERA 1996, Western Excavating, Weathersfield and Cow, and found that the claimant was unfairly (constructively) dismissed.
Remedy was split between the dismissal and contractual claims. For unfair dismissal, the tribunal awarded a basic award of £5,166.37, calculated as 12.5 x the claimant's weekly pay of £413.31, and a compensatory award of £632.36 for pension loss only. It did not award future wage loss because the claimant started work with Morrisons on 4 April 2020. It also awarded £5,594.89 for the unpaid wages contract claim and dismissed the holiday pay claim, giving overall monetary awards of £11,393.62.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Constructive unfair dismissal based on continuing underpayment of wages; resignation email dated 5 March 2020. | Upheld | — | £5,799 |
| Breach of contract | Award for outstanding wages after later payments of £500 on 29 June 2020 and £200 on 4 August 2020. | Upheld | — | £5,595 |
| Holiday pay | At the hearing the claimant said he would not be proceeding with holiday pay, but the operative order records the claim as dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £11,394
- across all upheld claims
- Basic award
- £5,166
- statutory, unfair dismissal
- Compensatory award
- £632
- compensatory remedy recorded
Legal tests applied
6 references- s.95(1)(c) ERA 1996
- Western Excavating (ECC) Limited v Sharp
- Weathersfield Limited t/a Van & Truck Rentals v Sargent
- Cow v Surrey & Berkshire Newspapers Limited
- Article 3 of the Employment Tribunals Extension of Jurisdiction (Scotland) Order 1994
- s.118(1)(a) and (b) ERA 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.