Case 4103340/2018 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4103340/2018 Ms N Logan v The Kilmarnock Football Club Limited st and 1 other — 2018
- Case reference
- 4103340/2018
- Decision date
- 25 October 2018
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge R Gall
Parties
3 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4103340/2018 Ms N Logan
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe judgment records that Ms N Logan's claim against the first and second respondents, The Kilmarnock Football Club Limited and Gary Dicker, had been withdrawn by the claimant. On that basis, Employment Judge R Gall dismissed the claim under Rule 52 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013.
The PDF does not set out any findings on liability, evidence, or remedy, and it does not record any award. The only substantive disposal is the formal dismissal following withdrawal.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sex discrimination | The PDF does not restate the substantive claim label, but the accompanying case listing identifies the matter as sex discrimination. The tribunal recorded that the claim against both respondents had been withdrawn by the claimant and was dismissed under Rule 52. | Dismissed | Sex | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 52 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.