Case 4103340/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs J Telima-Adolphus v JPS Ltd t/a Professional Health — 2019
- Case reference
- 4103340/2019
- Decision date
- 9 July 2019
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge A Kemp
- Venue
- Dundee
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs J Telima-Adolphus
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant, Mrs Johneba Telima-Adolphus, worked for JPS1 Ltd t/a 247 Professional Health from 19 July 2018 as a part-time carer. The first respondent did not enter appearance. The second respondent, the Secretary of State for Business, filed a written response disputing the claimant's status but did not attend the hearing. The tribunal heard only from the claimant and accepted her evidence.
The tribunal found that the written document headed "Contract for Services" did not reflect the reality of the relationship. The claimant wore a staff uniform, used the respondent's equipment, was sent to clients including care homes, and was controlled by her manager. She was paid through payroll with tax, national insurance and pension deductions, and the tribunal held that she was both a worker and an employee. It relied on the approach in Ready Mixed Concrete, Autoclenz, and Pimlico Plumbers, and concluded that there was mutuality of obligation and control.
On that basis, the tribunal held that the first respondent had made unlawful deductions from wages in respect of unpaid pay and holiday pay, and it awarded £499.45. It also found that the claimant had accrued 3.5 days' unused holiday at termination on 24 December 2018, after being told the respondent was going into liquidation, and that the amounts claimed were due to her by the first respondent.
The tribunal further found that the claimant did not receive statutory notice of termination. It held that the failure to give one week's notice was a breach of contract and awarded £172.26. The tribunal did not at that stage make judgment against the second respondent, saying the claimant could apply again if the sums were not paid and the second respondent then wished to make further submissions.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The award covered unpaid wages and holiday pay. The tribunal said it was quantified on a net basis using the pay advices and the limited evidence available. | Upheld | — | £499 |
| Breach of contract | The claim related to the respondent's failure to give the claimant one week's statutory notice of termination. The tribunal awarded the sum on a net basis. | Upheld | — | £172 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £672
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
11 references- s.27 Employment Rights Act 1996
- s.13 Employment Rights Act 1996
- s.23 Employment Rights Act 1996
- s.230 Employment Rights Act 1996
- s.86 Employment Rights Act 1996
- Ready Mixed Concrete (South East) Ltd v Minister of Pensions and National Insurance
- James v London Borough of Greenwich
- Autoclenz v Belcher
- Pimlico Plumbers Ltd v Smith
- Employment Tribunals (Extension of Jurisdiction) (Scotland) Order 1994
- Rule 2 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.