Case 4103352/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Gavin Wright v 15 City Gate Construction (Scotland) Limited — 2022
- Case reference
- 4103352/2020
- Decision date
- 26 January 2022
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge M Whitcombe
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Gavin Wright
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal found that Mr Gavin Wright was unfairly dismissed. The judgment records that oral reasons were given at the end of the hearing on 26 January 2022, but the extracted text does not include the detailed findings behind the unfair dismissal conclusion.
By consent, the respondent was found to have failed to provide the claimant with a statement of terms and conditions. The tribunal recorded that the appropriate remedy under section 38(3) of the Employment Act 2002 was an award of 2 weeks' pay, but the judgment does not state a numerical figure.
By consent, the respondent was also found to have failed to allow the claimant to be accompanied to a disciplinary hearing in breach of section 10 of the Employment Relations Act 1999. The tribunal again recorded that the appropriate remedy was an award of 2 weeks' pay. All remaining issues of remedy and calculation were to be dealt with at a remedy hearing on 9 February 2022.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal found the claimant was unfairly dismissed. The judgment text says oral reasons were given at the end of the hearing, but it does not set out the detailed reasoning or quantify any remedy at this stage. | Upheld | — | — |
| Other | By consent, the respondent failed to provide the claimant with a statement of terms and conditions. The tribunal stated that the appropriate remedy under section 38(3) of the Employment Act 2002 was an award of 2 weeks' pay, but no monetary figure is given in the judgment. | Upheld | — | — |
| Other | By consent, the respondent failed to allow the claimant to be accompanied to a disciplinary hearing in breach of section 10 of the Employment Relations Act 1999. The tribunal stated that the appropriate remedy was an award of 2 weeks' pay, but no monetary figure is given in the judgment. | Upheld | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- section 38(3) Employment Act 2002
- section 10 Employment Relations Act 1999
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.