Case 4103362/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Miss Z Brunton v St Class Care — 2018
- Case reference
- 4103362/2018
- Decision date
- 6 September 2018
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge F Jane Garvie
- Venue
- Glasgow
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss Z Brunton
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy letter dated 25 July 2018, Employment Judge Muriel Robison said she was considering striking out the claim for failure to actively pursue it. The Tribunal gave the claimant until 1 August 2018 to provide written reasons why that should not happen, or to request a hearing on the issue.
The claimant did not provide an acceptable reason and did not request a hearing. On that basis, Employment Judge F Jane Garvie struck out the claim under rule 37 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013, specifically on the ground that it had not been actively pursued within rule 37(1)(d).
The judgment records no substantive determination of the underlying employment claim(s) and no remedy award. The decision is therefore procedural only, with the claim ending by strike-out rather than on its merits.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment does not identify the substantive claim type(s); it states only that the claim was struck out under rule 37(1)(d) for not being actively pursued. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- rule 37
- rule 37(1)(d)
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.