Case 4103373/2019 · Employment Tribunal

EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4103373/2019 Mr D Petrovic v Kaiam Europe Limited (In Administration) — 2019

Case reference: 4103373/2019
Decision date: 14 May 2019
Jurisdiction: Scotland
Judge: Employment Judge Walker

Indexed: 21 May 2026

Parties

2 named

Claimant

EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4103373/2019 Mr D Petrovic

Respondent

Kaiam Europe Limited (In Administration)

Key findings

Tribunal's reasoning

The respondent stated that no part of the claim was contested. Employment Judge Walker therefore issued a rule 21 judgment on the available material. The tribunal declared that Kaiam Europe Limited (in Administration) had failed to comply with its obligations under section 188A of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992.

As a result, the tribunal made a protective award under section 189 of that Act in favour of the claimant, Mr D Petrovic, for a period of 90 days. The judgment does not set out a monetary calculation, and no separate sum is recorded in the extracted text. The decision was dated 13 May 2019 and entered in the register on 14 May 2019.

Claims and outcomes

1 finding recorded

Claim type	Issue or finding	Outcome	Protected characteristic	Award
Trade union	Rule 21 judgment under the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2013. The tribunal found the respondent had failed to comply with its obligations under section 188A of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992 and made a protective award under section 189 for a period of 90 days.	Upheld	—	—

Legal tests applied

3 references

Official outcome judgment PDF

Gov.uk primary record

The official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.

Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

How we got this data

Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.

Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.