Vol. I·6 May 2026

Search the index

Loading…

Loading page content.

Tribunal Watch

A structured, cross-cut index of UK employment tribunal decisions, built from the primary record at gov.uk/employment-tribunal-decisions. Independent of HMCTS and the Ministry of Justice.

Not legal advice. Information on this site is a matter of public record; it is not guidance on any individual case.

Editorial

About this site
Methodology
Corrections policy
Editorial standards

Rights & privacy

Open Government Licence v3.0
Privacy notice
Data subject requests
Atom feed (recent decisions)

Mr D Alexander v Kaiam Europe Limited (In Administration) CERTIFICATE OF CORRECTION Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013 In accordance with the power set out in — Employment Tribunal 2019 | Tribunal Watch

Tribunal Watch/Kaiam Europe Limited (In Administration) CERTIFICATE OF CORRECTION Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013 In accordance with the power set out in/4103376/2019

Case 4103376/2019 · Employment Tribunal

Mr D Alexander v Kaiam Europe Limited (In Administration) CERTIFICATE OF CORRECTION Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013 In accordance with the power set out in — 2019

Case reference: 4103376/2019
Decision date: 29 April 2019
Jurisdiction: Scotland
Judge: Employment Judge Susan Walker

Indexed: 26 April 2026

Parties

2 named

Claimant

Mr D Alexander

Respondent

Kaiam Europe Limited (In Administration) CERTIFICATE OF CORRECTION Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013 In accordance with the power set out in

Claims brought

2 categories

Other
Redundancy

Source tags (gov.uk)

Protective Award and Redundancy

Outcomes per claim are extracted in a second pass and are not yet published on this page.

Source document

Primary record

The full judgment is available on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

Download judgment (PDF)

How we got this data

Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.