Case 4103376/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr D Alexander v Kaiam Europe Limited (In Administration) CERTIFICATE OF CORRECTION Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013 In accordance with the power set out in — 2019
- Case reference
- 4103376/2019
- Decision date
- 29 April 2019
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Susan Walker
Parties
2 namedKey findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge Susan Walker issued a certificate of correction under rule 69 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013. The certificate corrects the judgment sent to the parties on 29 April 2019 by inserting the words 'commencing on the 21 December 2018' after the phrase 'for a period of 90 days'.
On the face of the correction, the underlying judgment therefore concerned a protective award for a 90-day protected period beginning on 21 December 2018. The certificate also records that the time limits for appeal or reconsideration were unchanged by the correction and that an amended version of the judgment was attached.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | Certificate of correction to the judgment sent to the parties on 29 April 2019. The correction inserts the words 'commencing on the 21 December 2018' after 'for a period of 90 days', indicating that the underlying award was a protective award for a 90-day protected period beginning on 21 December 2018. The supplied document does not state any monetary quantification. | Upheld | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.