Case 4103402/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Miss Agnieszka Milczarek v Onslow Guesthouse — 2020
- Case reference
- 4103402/2020
- Decision date
- 24 September 2020
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Ian McPherson
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss Agnieszka Milczarek
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a rule 21 judgment, issued because no response had been presented to the claim. On the available material, Employment Judge Ian McPherson found that the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from the claimant's wages in the sum of £197.04, calculated as 24 hours at £8.21 per hour for 4 hours work per day over 6 days between 16 and 21 March 2020.
The Tribunal also found a further unauthorised deduction from wages of £34.88, calculated as 4 hours at £8.72 per hour for 7 April 2020. The respondent was ordered to pay the claimant the total sum of £231.92.
The claimant's redundancy payment claim was dismissed because she had insufficient qualifying service: she had been employed by the respondent for less than two years. The judgment records no other remedy or adjustment beyond the wage award and the dismissal of the redundancy payment element.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment found two unauthorised deductions from wages: £197.04 for 24 hours at £8.21 per hour for 4 hours per day over 6 days between 16 and 21 March 2020, and £34.88 for 4 hours at £8.72 per hour on 7 April 2020. The total ordered was £231.92. | Upheld | — | £232 |
| Redundancy | The Tribunal found the claimant had less than two years' service and therefore did not have sufficient qualifying service to claim a redundancy payment. | Dismissed | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £232
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.