Case 4103403/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr U Ramesh v Represented by: Mr S B Sampath, friend Y & S Limited — 2023
- Case reference
- 4103403/2023
- Decision date
- 13 September 2023
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Smith
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr U Ramesh
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMr U Ramesh brought claims of unfair dismissal, race discrimination, and entitlement to a statutory redundancy payment against Y & S Limited. At the hearing in Edinburgh on 8 September 2023, the tribunal recorded that the respondent did not attend or have representation.
The judgment records that the claimant withdrew each of his claims. The tribunal accordingly dismissed the claims upon withdrawal under rule 52 of the Employment Tribunal Rules 2013. No substantive findings on liability were made.
The judgment states that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within 14 days. No remedy was awarded.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal stated that the claim was dismissed upon withdrawal by the claimant under rule 52. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Race discrimination | The tribunal stated that the race discrimination claim was dismissed upon withdrawal by the claimant under rule 52. | Withdrawn | Race | — |
| Redundancy | The tribunal stated that the statutory redundancy payment claim was dismissed upon withdrawal by the claimant under rule 52. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.