Case 4103409/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Miss Nicole Cumming v Trimetro Ltd — 2018
- Case reference
- 4103409/2018
- Decision date
- 15 June 2018
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Frances Eccles
- Venue
- Glasgow
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss Nicole Cumming
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant, Miss Nicole Cumming, sought unpaid wages and holiday pay. Neither respondent appeared or was represented. The tribunal proceeded on the basis that she was employed by Trimetro Ltd because she produced payslips in that company's name, and dismissed the second respondents from the proceedings on that basis.
The tribunal found that she was employed from 9 October 2017 to 3 February 2018. For 21 December 2017 to 21 January 2018 she was not paid, and the unpaid wages totalled £450.50, calculated as 53 hours at £8.50. The tribunal was satisfied that this amount had been deducted from wages without authority and ordered Trimetro Ltd to pay it. It also found that she took no annual leave during employment and was entitled to the equivalent of 20 hours' holiday pay, assessed at £242.84, which the first respondent was also ordered to pay.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found £450.50 was unpaid for 53 hours at £8.50 and was deducted from wages without authority. | Upheld | — | £451 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found the claimant had taken no annual leave and was entitled to 20 hours' holiday pay assessed at £242.84. | Upheld | — | £243 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £693
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.