Case 4103410/2018 · Employment Tribunal
M Robison Miss L de Jongh v IBA Recruitment Limited — 2018
- Case reference
- 4103410/2018
- Decision date
- 11 May 2018
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Ms
Parties
2 namedClaimant
M Robison Miss L de Jongh
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim form was sent to the respondent on 21 March 2018 and no response was entered within the required 28 days. The Employment Judge therefore determined liability on the material available and made a Rule 21 default judgment without a hearing.
The claimant succeeded on the redundancy complaint, which the judgment describes as unfair dismissal by reason of redundancy, and the tribunal awarded £892.50. It also awarded £297.50 for holiday pay, £765.00 for unpaid wages calculated as 90 hours at £8.50 per hour, and £1,190.00 for notice pay calculated as four weeks' notice at £8.50 per hour.
The reasons section contains a £465.00 figure for unpaid wages, but the opening disposal and the stated hourly calculation support £765.00, which is the figure used in the operative part of the judgment. No other remedy components are addressed in the text supplied.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | The judgment describes this as the claimant's complaint of unfair dismissal by reason of redundancy; the dispositional order awards £892.50 in respect of redundancy pay. | Upheld | — | £893 |
| Holiday pay | Awarded as one week's holiday pay at £8.50 per hour. | Upheld | — | £298 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The reasons section contains a £465.00 figure, but the opening judgment and the stated calculation of 90 hours at £8.50 per hour support £765.00. | Upheld | — | £765 |
| Breach of contract | Awarded as notice pay for 4 weeks at £8.50 per hour. | Upheld | — | £1,190 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £3,145
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.