Case 4103411/2018 · Employment Tribunal

69(scot) claim dismissed on withdrawal rule EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4103411/2018 Mr C Mitchell v Represented by: Ms J Merchant Solicitor Bilfinger Salamis UK Limited — 2019

Case reference: 4103411/2018
Decision date: 27 March 2019
Jurisdiction: Scotland
Judge: Employment Judge Ian McFatridge

Indexed: 23 May 2026

Parties

2 named

Claimant

69(scot) claim dismissed on withdrawal rule EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4103411/2018 Mr C Mitchell

Respondent

Represented by: Ms J Merchant Solicitor Bilfinger Salamis UK Limited

Key findings

Tribunal's reasoning

The tribunal recorded that the claim had been withdrawn by the claimant. On that basis, Employment Judge Ian McFatridge dismissed the claim under Rule 52 of Schedule 1 to the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013.

The extracted judgment does not identify the underlying substantive allegation(s), and it records no merits findings or remedy award. The decision is therefore a procedural disposal only, made on withdrawal rather than after determination of the substance of the case.

Claims and outcomes

1 finding recorded

Claim type	Issue or finding	Outcome	Protected characteristic	Award
Other	The judgment does not identify the substantive cause of action(s). It records that the claim had been withdrawn by the claimant and was dismissed under Rule 52 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013.	Withdrawn	—	—

Legal tests applied

1 reference

Official outcome judgment PDF

Gov.uk primary record

The official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.

Open official judgment PDF on gov.uk

Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

How we got this data

Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.

Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.