Case 4103425/2023 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4103425/2023 (V) Held at Aberdeen on November 2023 Employment Judge N M Hosie Mr Jack Sweeney v Colin’s MOT & Service Centre Ltd — 2023
- Case reference
- 4103425/2023
- Decision date
- 2 November 2023
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Venue
- Aberdeen
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4103425/2023 (V) Held at Aberdeen on November 2023 Employment Judge N M Hosie Mr Jack Sweeney
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant, Jack Sweeney, worked for the respondent as a Mobile Mechanic from 8 May 2023 until 6 June 2023. On 6 June he texted Richard Evans to resign, saying the job was not working out, and then asked whether his wages for the week would be processed for Friday. Mr Evans replied, “nope”, and no payment was made. On the papers before it, the tribunal was satisfied that £870 wages were due and that the non-payment was an unlawful deduction from wages under s.23 Employment Rights Act 1996.
The respondent did not lodge an ET3 response. The tribunal recorded that there had been attempts to intimate the claim to the respondent trading as Colin’s Tyres, and later to Colin’s MOT & Service Centre Ltd at its registered office. The judge was satisfied from the claim form and supporting documents that a judgment could be issued without a hearing and noted that the claimant’s allegations were consistent and convincing.
The tribunal also found that the claimant had not been provided with a written statement of particulars of employment, as required by s.1 Employment Rights Act 1996. Because the claimant succeeded in a claim listed in Schedule 5 to the Employment Act 2002, the tribunal awarded the statutory minimum amount of two weeks’ pay. The judgment records that a week’s pay was capped at £643, so the award for this failure was £1,286.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Claim under s.23 Employment Rights Act 1996 for unpaid wages. Tribunal found the claimant should have received £870 and that this was an unlawful deduction from wages. | Upheld | — | £870 |
| Other | The tribunal awarded compensation for the respondent’s failure to provide a written statement of particulars of employment under s.1 Employment Rights Act 1996. No separate claim type is specified in the judgment, so this is classified as other. | Upheld | — | £1,286 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,156
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
5 references- s.23 Employment Rights Act 1996
- s.1 Employment Rights Act 1996
- Schedule 5 Employment Act 2002
- minimum amount of two weeks' pay
- week's pay capped at £643
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.