Case 4103436/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr S Gomes & others v Ability Hotels (Aberdeen) Ltd — 2020
- Case reference
- 4103436/2020
- Decision date
- 1 May 2020
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Frances Eccles
- Venue
- Glasgow
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr S Gomes & others
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningNo response had been presented to the claim, so Employment Judge Frances Eccles issued judgment under Rule 21 on the available information. The claimants were the individuals listed in the attached schedule, and the respondent was Ability Hotels (Aberdeen) Ltd (In Liquidation). The tribunal found that the respondent failed to comply with its obligations under sections 188 and 188A of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992.
The tribunal therefore made a protective award under section 189 of the 1992 Act. The judgment states that the protected period was 90 days starting on 19 May 2020. The extracted text does not state any monetary figure for the award, so no amount can be recorded from this judgment text alone.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | Rule 21 judgment on the available information. The tribunal found that the respondent failed to comply with its obligations under sections 188 and 188A of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992 and made a protective award under section 189. No monetary sum was stated in the extracted text. | Upheld | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.