Case 4103436/2022 · Employment Tribunal

EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case Number: 4103436/2022 Ms N Agrawal v DSA Practice Limited - In Compulsory Liquidation — 2024

Case reference: 4103436/2022
Decision date: 13 May 2024
Jurisdiction: Scotland

Indexed: 21 May 2026

Parties

2 named

Claimant

EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case Number: 4103436/2022 Ms N Agrawal

Respondent

DSA Practice Limited - In Compulsory Liquidation

Key findings

Tribunal's reasoning

The tribunal struck out Ms N Agrawal's claim under rule 37 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013 on the ground that it had not been actively pursued within rule 37(1)(d). The respondent company had gone into compulsory liquidation, and the claimant had been advised on 1 February 2023 that she needed to apply to the court for permission to continue legal proceedings.

The tribunal recorded that the claimant had not provided evidence that she had made such an application. It also gave her an opportunity on 17 April 2024 to provide written reasons by 24 April 2024, or to request a hearing to explain why the claim should not be struck out. The claimant did not give an acceptable reason and did not request a hearing, so the claim was struck out.

Claims and outcomes

1 finding recorded

Claim type	Issue or finding	Outcome	Protected characteristic	Award
Other	The extracted judgment does not identify the substantive cause of action. The gov.uk listing category was unlawful deduction from wages, but that is not stated in the judgment text itself.	Struck out	—	—

Legal tests applied

3 references

Official outcome judgment PDF

Gov.uk primary record

The official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.

Open official judgment PDF on gov.uk

Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

How we got this data

Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.

Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.