Case 4103443/2022 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case Number: 4103443/2022 Mr J E Nogues v DSA Practice Limited - In Compulsory Liquidation — 2024
- Case reference
- 4103443/2022
- Decision date
- 16 May 2024
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge EJ Macleod
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case Number: 4103443/2022 Mr J E Nogues
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe respondent company was in compulsory liquidation. The tribunal recorded that the claimant was told on 1 February 2023 that he had to apply to the court for permission to continue the proceedings, but he did not provide evidence that any such application had been made.
On 17 April 2024 the tribunal gave the claimant an opportunity to provide written reasons by 24 April 2024, or to request a hearing, to address why the claim should not be struck out. The claimant did not give an acceptable reason and did not request a hearing.
The tribunal therefore struck out the claim under rule 37 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013, specifically rule 37(1)(d), on the basis that the claim had not been actively pursued.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment does not identify the substantive cause of action. The reason given is that the claim was struck out under rule 37(1)(d) for not being actively pursued. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- rule 37
- rule 37(1)(d)
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.