Case 4103461/2023 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4103461/2023 Ms L Ding v Aura Clinic — 2023
- Case reference
- 4103461/2023
- Decision date
- 7 August 2023
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4103461/2023 Ms L Ding
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was determined under rule 21 because no response had been presented by the respondent, and the Employment Judge decided the claim on the available material. The tribunal upheld the claim for unauthorised deduction from wages and ordered the respondent to pay £672.00 gross, calculated as 56 hours at £12.00 per hour, being the sum equivalent to the deduction made.
The tribunal rejected the notice-pay aspect of the breach of contract claim. It found that the claimant was not continuously employed by the respondent for one month or more, and therefore made no award for breach of contract in respect of notice.
The tribunal also found that the respondent had failed to provide the claimant with a written statement of terms and conditions. It awarded £495.18 gross, calculated as two weeks' pay at £247.59 per week. The judgment also allowed the respondent to deduct income tax and employee national insurance contributions, if required by law, before payment of the sums awarded.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Unauthorised deduction from wages; award made as the gross sum of £672.00, calculated as 56 hours x £12.00 per hour. | Upheld | — | £672 |
| Breach of contract | The claimant was found not to have been continuously employed by the respondent for one month or more, so no award for breach of contract in respect of notice was made. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Other | Failure to provide a written statement of terms and conditions; award made as the gross sum of £495.18, calculated as 2 weeks' pay x £247.59 per week. | Upheld | — | £495 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,167
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.