Case 4103462/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Claimant v AFS Logistics Ltd — 2022
- Case reference
- 4103462/2022
- Decision date
- 14 October 2022
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge F Eccles Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Claimant
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningOn 16 August 2022 the Tribunal asked the claimant to provide information about the sum he was claiming and his employment status, with a reply requested by 22 August 2022. The claimant did not respond, and a reminder sent on 26 August 2022 also received no reply. On 13 September 2022 the Tribunal gave the claimant until 27 September 2022 to provide written reasons or request a hearing as to why the claim should not be struck out.
The claimant did not give an acceptable reason for the claim to continue and did not request a hearing. Employment Judge F Eccles therefore struck out the claim under rule 37 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013 on the basis that it had not been actively pursued under rule 37(1)(d). The judgment records no monetary award.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | Struck out under rule 37(1)(d) because the claim was not actively pursued. The judgment does not specify the substantive claim type in the extracted text. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- rule 37(1)(d)
- rule 37
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.