Case 4103477/2023 · Employment Tribunal

EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case Number: 4103477/2023 Mrs A Murdoch v SM & KE Limited t/a Flynn’s Boatyard — 2024

Case reference: 4103477/2023
Decision date: 20 September 2024
Jurisdiction: Scotland

Indexed: 23 May 2026

Parties

2 named

Claimant

EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case Number: 4103477/2023 Mrs A Murdoch

Respondent

SM & KE Limited t/a Flynn’s Boatyard

Key findings

Tribunal's reasoning

The tribunal struck out Mrs Murdoch's claim under rule 37 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013 on the ground that it had not been actively pursued. The reasons record that a letter dated 6 February 2024 told the claimant she would need to apply for the respondent to be restored to the Companies House Register for the claim to proceed, and a further reminder was sent on 13 August 2024.

The claimant did not reply to either letter. A strike out warning letter was then sent on 2 September 2024, giving the claimant until 16 September 2024 to lodge a reply or request a hearing. No response was lodged, and the tribunal therefore struck out the claim. No monetary award was made.

Claims and outcomes

1 finding recorded

Claim type	Issue or finding	Outcome	Protected characteristic	Award
Other	The judgment does not identify a specific substantive claim type. It states that the claim was struck out under rule 37 because it had not been actively pursued. Letters dated 6 February 2024 and 13 August 2024 told the claimant that the respondent would have to be restored to the Companies House Register for the claim to proceed, but no reply was received.	Struck out	—	—

Legal tests applied

1 reference

Official outcome judgment PDF

Gov.uk primary record

The official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.

Open official judgment PDF on gov.uk

Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

How we got this data

Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.

Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.