Case 4103483/2012 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs C Diack v Respondent — 2018
- Case reference
- 4103483/2012
- Decision date
- 30 November 2018
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Laura Doherty
- Venue
- Glasgow
Parties
1 namedClaimant
Mrs C Diack
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningOn 25 September 2018 the tribunal gave the claimant until 2 October 2018 to provide written reasons why the claim should not be struck out, or to request a hearing on that issue. The claimant did not provide acceptable reasons and did not request a hearing.
The tribunal therefore struck out the claim under rule 37 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013, on the ground that it had not been actively pursued within rule 37(1)(d). The judgment records a procedural strike out only and does not include any determination of the underlying merits.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equal pay | The tribunal struck out the claim under rule 37 on the basis that it had not been actively pursued. The judgment does not identify any substantive liability finding or award. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- rule 37(1)(d)
- rule 37 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.