Case 4103486/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr S Hakeem v M Ramzan — 2025
- Case reference
- 4103486/2023
- Decision date
- 23 January 2025
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge P Smith
- Venue
- Glasgow
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr S Hakeem
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal held that the Respondent made unauthorised deductions from wages in respect of both Claimants. It found that no payments of wages properly payable had been made to them throughout the period of their engagement as workers, which ran from early December 2022 to 1 March 2023.
For the First Claimant, the tribunal ordered payment of £7,200.30 gross in compensation for unauthorised deductions from wages. For the Second Claimant, it ordered payment of £3,297.38 gross, the tribunal recording that this represented wages properly payable of £3,357.30 less an advance of £60 already paid.
The judgment was given orally at the hearing, and the written reasons note says no written reasons will be provided unless requested. The decision is a straightforward wages claim outcome with no discrimination, dismissal, or other separate substantive findings recorded in the extracted text.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | First Claimant: the tribunal held the Respondent made unauthorised deductions of wages by making no payments of wages properly payable during the period of engagement as a worker between early December 2022 and 1 March 2023. | Upheld | — | £7,200 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Second Claimant: the tribunal held the Respondent made unauthorised deductions of wages by making no payments of wages properly payable during the period of engagement as a worker between early December 2022 and 1 March 2023. The amount recorded was £3,357.30 less an advance of £60 already paid. | Upheld | — | £3,297 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £10,498
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.