Case 4103489/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Ms B Gauntlett v Ability Hotels (Aberdeen) Ltd — 2020
- Case reference
- 4103489/2020
- Decision date
- 2 September 2020
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge F Eccles
- Venue
- Glasgow
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms B Gauntlett
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningNo response having been presented to the claim, Employment Judge F Eccles issued judgment on the available information under Rule 21. The tribunal found that Ability Hotels (Aberdeen) Ltd failed to comply with its obligations under sections 188 and 188A of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992.
The tribunal therefore made a protective award under section 189 of TULRCA 1992. The award was for 90 days starting on 11 May 2020.
The extracted judgment does not set out any monetary calculation or separate breakdown of the award, and no other claims are recorded in the text supplied.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trade union | No response was presented. The tribunal issued judgment on the available information under Rule 21 and found a failure to comply with sections 188 and 188A of TULRCA 1992, making a protective award under section 189. The award was stated as 90 days starting on 11 May 2020, but no monetary sum was given in the extracted text. | Upheld | — | — |
Legal tests applied
4 references- Rule 21
- s.188 TULRCA 1992
- s.188A TULRCA 1992
- s.189 TULRCA 1992
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.